| Pages: [1] |
1. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Ships would explode without a shot being fired, especially on the Jita 4-4 undock. except that Jita 4-4 undock will be clean after 1 day after this change came to server One more reason to spli...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:59:00
|
2. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: You are banned from replying in this thread. Enjoy the rest of YOU day. * Your I'm not banned from anything. Enjoy the rest of your day. Yes...you are. From this thread. I don't want to see yo...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:49:00
|
3. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muestereate wrote: Bumping is overpowered allready So lets add the rule that collisions cause reprisals from CONCORD. I fully understand that this would be unmanageable and completely exploitable, but this is a 'What If' thread.
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:41:00
|
4. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Heh, it would make fully-plated, MWD Battleships hilarious to just plow into anything smaller (cool, a way to gank mining ships without getting concorded). Warp a fleet of 50 freighters onto the 4-4 undock, and watch e...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:39:00
|
5. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: Yes...I didn't think about this change. This could completely change the dynamic of shield vs armor tanking for the purposes of PVP. I would think the shields of one would produce some level of damage to an u...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:21:00
|
6. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: Kimmi Chan wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: You do realize don't you that when a question has been asked '...again and again, over and over, ad nauseum." That usually means that there is an issue that shou...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:14:00
|
7. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Victor Andall wrote: James Nikolas Tesla wrote: An image comes to mind of a Titan steamrolling through an entire fleet. Considering a titan's speed, I would say more like "gently pushing aside" I think the main reason, though, for this b...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:13:00
|
8. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caviar Liberta wrote: Marit Mankalas wrote: Maybe, there would be something like "the shield of both ships reduce the speed of the colision and there is no domage in normal conditions". So there will be real damage only if one of the ship i...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:06:00
|
9. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: You do realize don't you that when a question has been asked '...again and again, over and over, ad nauseum." That usually means that there is an issue that should be addressed and and YOU are probably a ...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 16:01:00
|
10. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Nikolas Tesla wrote: An image comes to mind of a Titan steamrolling through an entire fleet. Awesome thought.
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 15:50:00
|
11. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hasikan Miallok wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: Not sure where the negativity is coming from. I just posed a valid question that I would hope would provoke some alternative thoughts on game play. Thank you to all that at least attempted to stay ...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.27 15:47:00
|
12. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: Not sure where the negativity is coming from. I can tell you where it's coming from. Vanity Tian wrote: I just posed a valid question that I would hope would provoke some alternative thoughts on ga...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.26 22:37:00
|
13. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not sure where the negativity is coming from. I just posed a valid question that I would hope would provoke some alternative thoughts on game play. Thank you to all that at least attempted to stay on topic and not just dismiss the original quest...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.26 22:22:00
|
14. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: How would EVE change if when a ship runs into another ship, damage would be given to both ships relative to their mass and speed? If I have miss-worded that question I am sorry. But I hope that you ...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.26 21:57:00
|
15. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: How would EVE change if when a ship runs into another ship, damage would be given to both ships relative to their mass and speed? If I have miss-worded that question I am sorry. But I hope that you unders...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.26 21:38:00
|
16. Collisions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How would EVE change if when a ship runs into another ship, damage would be given to both ships relative to their mass and speed? If I have miss-worded that question I am sorry. But I hope that you understand the spirit of the question. I'm truly...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.26 21:29:00
|
17. Pipebombing? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Maldoror wrote: Vanity Tian wrote: btw - the 100 ship loss I was referring to was the one where 100 Harpies were taken out. Scipio Artelius wrote: Including pod express too, wasn't it a couple of hundred in 30 sec (I seem to re...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.25 22:03:00
|
18. Pipebombing? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Excellent! Thank you for the information! I would think that anticipating a warp point would be the most difficult thing. I would very much like to be a part of something like that someday. Hopefully on the planning executing side though...not so ...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.21 00:37:00
|
19. Pipebombing? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hello all - I have been watching a few Rooks and Kings videos and the term 'Pipebomb' came up several times in several videos. I have a suspicion that it has something to do with smart bombs / bombs from stealth bombers and a warp bubble or HIC de...
- by Vanity Tian - at 2014.02.20 16:27:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |